Comments on: OPML support in Java – Missing in Action http://www.j2eegeek.com/blog/2006/03/06/opml-support-in-java-missing-in-action/ In the kingdom of hope, there is no winter. Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:23:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bharat http://www.j2eegeek.com/blog/2006/03/06/opml-support-in-java-missing-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-7572 Bharat Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:37:06 +0000 http://www.j2eegeek.com/blog/2006/03/06/opml-support-in-java-missing-in-action/#comment-7572 Vinay, Just dumb suggestion but "RSSOwl" uses "Parser for the OPML 1.0 Format" which uses jdom to parse ompl files. Thnx Vinay,
Just dumb suggestion but “RSSOwl” uses “Parser for the OPML 1.0 Format” which uses jdom to parse ompl files.
Thnx

]]> By: Vinny Carpenter http://www.j2eegeek.com/blog/2006/03/06/opml-support-in-java-missing-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-7282 Vinny Carpenter Tue, 07 Mar 2006 02:15:44 +0000 http://www.j2eegeek.com/blog/2006/03/06/opml-support-in-java-missing-in-action/#comment-7282 Hi Lisa. I think it would be a great thing if the Java community and OPML community would collaborate on a solution that would be an accepted (I don't dare use the word endorsed :) ) and stay current with the evolving standards. There are a couple of projects out there that have OPML support and I want to see if those efforts are going to look at implementing the new specification or if I should just start something new to do this. Duplication always leads to conflict and so I would rather contribute to making an existing solution like Informa or ROME step forward and take a stab at implementing it. As as aside, I did email <a href="http://www.scripting.com/" rel="nofollow">Dave</a> this morning to see if he can use his mojo to get some people moving on this :) Thanks Hi Lisa. I think it would be a great thing if the Java community and OPML community would collaborate on a solution that would be an accepted (I don’t dare use the word endorsed :) ) and stay current with the evolving standards.

There are a couple of projects out there that have OPML support and I want to see if those efforts are going to look at implementing the new specification or if I should just start something new to do this. Duplication always leads to conflict and so I would rather contribute to making an existing solution like Informa or ROME step forward and take a stab at implementing it.

As as aside, I did email Dave this morning to see if he can use his mojo to get some people moving on this :) Thanks

]]> By: Lisa Williams http://www.j2eegeek.com/blog/2006/03/06/opml-support-in-java-missing-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-7280 Lisa Williams Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:06:45 +0000 http://www.j2eegeek.com/blog/2006/03/06/opml-support-in-java-missing-in-action/#comment-7280 Please pardon me if this is a dumb question, but to get the support, who would have to do the work, people in the Java community, or people in the OPML Community? I have a blog, OPML Fan, that's a roundup of developments in OPML and news of people in the OPML Community, and I would be interested to know. Feel free to drop me a line at lisa AT cadence90 dot com, or, if you feel moved, write another post and tag it as OPML and I'll definitely read and respond to it. Please pardon me if this is a dumb question, but to get the support, who would have to do the work, people in the Java community, or people in the OPML Community?

I have a blog, OPML Fan, that’s a roundup of developments in OPML and news of people in the OPML Community, and I would be interested to know. Feel free to drop me a line at lisa AT cadence90 dot com, or, if you feel moved, write another post and tag it as OPML and I’ll definitely read and respond to it.

]]>